3.2parison between Pages that have Dogs and you can Users versus Pets

Socio-group data and amount of reputation images presented for everyone analysed users (letter = 2400) and you will separately having Vienna (letter = 1200) and you can Tokyo (n = 1200).

Of the 2400 investigated profiles, 373 (15.5%) displayed at least one animal photo. In both cities, we found a positive correlation between the number of profile photos and the number of profile photos showing animals (Vienna: r_s = 0.184; p = 0.008 | Tokyo: r_s = 0.206; p = 0.009).

Comparison of the users who displayed animal photos on their profile and the users who did not do so resulted in the following significant differences (see Dining table 5 ). On the selected analysed dating app, significantly more women than men (p = 0.049) present animal photos on their profiles. Further, significantly more users in Vienna (p = 0.006), and significantly more older colombiancupid login users (p = 0.019), have profiles with animal photos as compared with users in Tokyo and younger users. In addition, users who display an animal photo on their profile post, on average, display one more photo than users who do not do so (p < 0.001). No significant differences between heterosexual and homosexual users of the analysed app were identified (p = 0.639) (see Table 5 ).

Table 5

Socio-demographic analysis and you can level of character photo showed for everybody pages which have pets (n = 373) and you will profiles in the place of pet (n = 2027).

step three.step 3. Frequency and you may Classification of Pets Presented for the Users

A further function of the study would be to determine how many users showed pet and you may what forms of creature were showed. Generally speaking, a lot more users into the Vienna (211; 17.6%) tell you pets on the character than users when you look at the Tokyo (162; 13.5%) (? 2 (1) = seven.622; p = 0.006). All of the profiles-i.age., 77.7% during the Vienna and you can 76.5% when you look at the Tokyo-presented the pet, or animals, on the just one character photos. Within the a smaller sized proportion regarding times-i.elizabeth., twenty two.3% inside the Vienna and you may 23.5% when you look at the Tokyo-the brand new users got multiple photo showing the animal, or animals, within character.

step 3.step three.1. Presentation regarding Dogs in the 1st Reputation Photo

Of one’s 373 profiles deciding to become animal pictures, 73 (19.6%) shown the newest pets on the basic profile photo. Right here, analysis away from pages in the Vienna and you may Tokyo shown high variations just like the 65.9% profiles in Vienna presented a puppy towards the very first pictures while the compared with 30.3% out-of users within the Tokyo (? dos (1) = 8.610, p = 0.003). In addition, just users in the Vienna (twelve.2%) demonstrate farm pet into first reputation photo. Which contributed to a change to help you profiles in Tokyo (? 2 (1) = cuatro.189, p = 0.041). I as well as unearthed that even more users from inside the Tokyo presented kitties (forty.6%) and exotic pet (fifteen.6%) inside their basic profile photo than just users within the Vienna (pets = dos.4%; amazing animals = 0.0%) (cats: ? 2 (1) = seven.819, p = 0.005; amazing dogs: ? 2 (1) = six.877, p = 0.009).

3.step 3.2. Presentation out-of Pets in all Reputation Images (For instance the Earliest Character Pictures)

Figure 1 shows the percentages of various animal species shown on the analysed profiles. Again, comparison between the profiles in Vienna and Tokyo revealed significant differences here. Users in Tokyo were significantly more likely to show cats (35.8%) and small animals (6.8%) than users in Vienna (cats = 18.0%; small animals = 0.0%) (cats: ? 2 (1) = , p < 0.001; small animals: ? 2 (1) = , p < 0.001). The Viennese profiles included farm animal (10.9%) and horse (7.1%) photos significantly more often than the profiles in Tokyo (farm animals = 0.6%; horses = 1.2%) (farm animals: ? 2 (1) = , p < 0.001; horses: ? 2 (1) = 7.270, p = 0.007) (see Figure 1 ).