Religiosity is actually discovered to be the strongest predictor regarding sexual prejudice within analyses

admin

Religiosity is actually discovered to be the strongest predictor regarding sexual prejudice within analyses

Ergo, we restricted our very own analyses to help you participants’ thinking on the homosexual someone, in the place of specific thoughts reviews between homosexual folk

Extremely Puerto Ricans follow some translation of the Christian tradition. Offered Christianity’s position to your homosexuality because a wicked lifetime, this is simply not shocking to find a powerful negative relationship ranging from religiosity and sexual bias (Diaz, 1998; Carrier, 1995). Furthermore, i requested whether or not religiosity you are going to raise intimate prejudice by growing participants’ ethical opposition to interact with gay individuals and you may/or understand one interactions having gay someone given that confident. However, an architectural design having religiosity anticipating sexual bias together with the most other research variables is actually found to be unreliable and unstable. For this reason, we really do not faith religiosity is the driving foundation for all most other investigation details. If you’re an intervention to lessen individuals’ religiosity is actually unethical, i perform highly recommend open talks of Christianity’s position toward intimate direction as opposed to homosexual habits within this religious setup (Choice, Serafini, Rabkin, Remien, & Williams, 1994). These items will get beat Puerto Rican’s negative attitudes with the gay boys and you may female by removing the focus of stigma on homosexual personal to a specific intimate decisions.

Fundamentally, we located zero sex differences in the brand new associations ranging from intimate bias in addition to research details. Still, the absence of sex difference could be due to the measurement out-of intimate bias. The differences when you look at the goods blogs in our ATL and ATG subscales make exact reviews among them subscales unfeasible. Past training finding intercourse variations in perceptions to your homosexuality adapted this new ATLG items wording ABD’de AvrupalД± ​​bekarlarla tanД±ЕџД±n becoming the same except for brand new source category (we.e., “[Male/Female] homosexuality are a beneficial perversion.”) (Herek, 2002a). Having said that, perhaps the differences in intimate prejudice for the research populace was perhaps not because of a gender dichotomy however, to help you distinctions across the sex jobs (Sakalli, 2002). Males that have better salience inside the machismo and in its thinking away from masculinity should render better intimate bias certainly people (Cunningham, 1998). Coming lookup should explore just how items wording, social opinions, and you can gender distinctions ong Puerto Ricans.

However, contrasting anywhere between all of our design and the approach design recommend that religiosity, positive event having gay some body, and you will level of relations which have homosexual boys and you may lesbian predict intimate prejudice much better than the newest alternate causal route

Our very own research has several limits. Basic, the new study’s mix-sectional investigation restricted the firm temporary buying of one’s parameters. Future lookup would be to mention brand new causal relationship involving the data variables. 2nd, economic and you may financing limits decreased our very own ability to collect more substantial shot. More substantial try which are often separated inside the random halves may accommodate even more variations become made on one 50 % of the brand new test, when you are comparison the fresh totally-modified design throughout the most other arbitrary half. Third, investigation conclusions are low-generalizable to have Puerto Rican low-college populations. Whether or not people searched motivated to be involved in the research, prior search located people who have lower informative attainment have a tendency to rating highest into sexual prejudice (Herek, 2002). Fourth, we didn’t determine in the event that people interacted having gay people or lesbians who care about-uncovered its intimate orientation or if perhaps it believed some men and you will females was homosexuals. Fifth, our very own inability to assess what amount of college students missing in this for each class into the survey limitations the new analysis of prospective coverage biases. Nevertheless, as investigation collection happened early in brand new session, we feel the chances of dropouts and youngsters maybe not probably lecture have reduced. Eventually, religiosity’s effect on intimate prejudice is worth deeper mining. Our research is actually incapable of assemble details about participants’ religious associations. Because of the assortment regarding Religious living (85% Roman Catholic and you can fifteen% Protestant and other; CIA Business Factbook (2005)), upcoming training is explore whether religiosity’s impact on sexual bias may vary of the spiritual living.

Добавить комментарий

    Свежие комментарии