The questions to assess matchmaking partner being compatible were the same as just what you to might find on the eHarmony or fits

On coming in to the lab, professionals finished created advised agree. Players was indeed resting during the a pc and you may expected to accomplish a beneficial survey, including an evaluation of identity and you will questions assessing personal companion compatibility. As in the earlier education, grandiose narcissism Women’s Choice dating services are assessed on Narcissistic Character Index (NPI ? = .86, M = , SD = 7.20) and you will Big Four personality traits towards the Big Five Catalog (BFI) . Having neuroticism, ? = .82; Yards = dos.77, SD = 0.80; to own extraversion, ? = .84, M = 3.46, SD = 0.72; to possess visibility to relax and play, ? = .75, Yards = step three.55, SD = 0.58; to have conscientiousness, ? = .76; Meters = 3.67, SD = 0.56; and also for agreeableness, ? = .73, Meters = 3.97, SD = 0.51.

That it survey wasn’t utilized for analysis whilst is region of the protection tale. Members had been told the recommendations it considering could well be utilized to complement her or him up with somebody to the campus who has got comparable hobbies. Finally, gender, many years, and you may relationships standing were examined.

After the process detail by detail of the Parker and you may Burkley , users was basically 2nd shown an image of a target personal and you will told that based on the prior responses, he’s “equivalent welfare” using this address. The women seen a picture of a man target and also the guys viewed a picture of a female target. This type of photo was pre-checked out by an effective ple for their quantity of attractiveness using a beneficial 10-section scale, in a fashion that step 1 = extremely unattractive and you can 10 = really attractive. The latest indicate get toward men photo is six.62 (SD = step 1.86) therefore the indicate get to own ladies photos try seven.03 (SD = step 1.29). Particularly Parker and you can Burkley, we along with asked players a few questions about the new participant’s interest in the prospective, however, our centered details was indeed only the products that examined spouse poaching especially. Solutions were made to the 5-section balances in a way that step 1 = most unlikely and you will 5 = very possible. The items was in fact a good) “Just how probably would you end up being to follow this individual getting a matchmaking?” (M = dos.43, SD = 1.28), and you may b) “Just how more than likely might you feel and make aside with this particular personal?” (M = 2.38, SD = step one.34). I also analyzed the latest the total amount that the fresh new new member receive the new target attractive using a beneficial 5-area size in a manner that step one = most unsightly and you may 5 = really attractive (M = step three.76, SD = 1.15).

Overall performance

We very first mainly based all the details ahead of calculating analyses. I upcoming computed correlations between predictor/handle parameters (the big Five parameters) and you will benefit parameters, which happen to be displayed for the Desk six. Grandiose narcissism try correlated with a greater probability of kissing into address, however which have choosing the target attractive otherwise after the target to possess a relationship.

Members was basically randomly allotted to a conclusion of address since the “single” or “in a romance” and you can was then expected for taking a preliminary survey to the number of attention he’s got in the address

I after that inserted parameters to your a regression model; first parameters from participants’ matchmaking standing, target matchmaking status, intercourse, and you will NPI ratings was indeed registered on Step one (dealing with to have Big Four variables), the several-method interactions one of number 1 variables was in fact inserted into the Step 2, every three-means relationships certainly number one variables were joined with the 3, plus the five-ways correspondence one of number 1 variables was joined on the Step. Once the none of one’s four-ways interactions reached statistical value, Step 3 analyses is actually claimed in Table eight.

For finding the mark attractive, simply fundamental consequences getting gender and you will good participants’ matchmaking reputation was high. Males was in fact likely to find the address attractive than just female, and you will single people had been likely to find the address attractive than just attached someone. Grandiose narcissism was not a predictor to find the goal glamorous typically (? = -.067, t = -0.913, p = .362) and you will grandiose narcissists did not select connected needs much more attractive than just unattached aim (? = -.052, t = -0.842, p = .401).