During the cyber relationships discipline, there clearly was up to ten

3. Abilities

Desk step 1 portrays the latest incidence of any of your dangers of the study, with respect to the level of severity found. As well, they suggests brand new contrasting amongst the withdrawals regarding boys and girls into the more dangers. Total, the participants exactly who presented no problem varied ranging from % who’d no troubles having tricky Internet fool around with or over so you can 83.4% that has no troubles which have on the internet brushing. I remember that the variety of modest and you may serious issues ranged ranging from 4% to have sexting and 17% having difficult Internet sites use. 9% from average/severe troubles plus cyberbullying, it reached 13.7%. Brand new frequencies found in the other degrees of trouble was indeed always better for women than for guys.

Desk step 1

Prevalence each and every of the risks because the a purpose of new seriousness of your disease to the total attempt as well as sex.

In this regard, significant differences were also found between boys and girls in the mean total scores of cyberbullying victimization (Welch’s t = ?2.02, p < 0.043, d = 0.07), online grooming (Welch's t = ?3.51, p < 0.001, d = 0.12) and problematic Internet use (Welch's t = ?2.07, p < 0.039, d = 0.07). In these cases, the mean scores were higher for girls than for boys. There were no significant differences in the rest of the risks: cyber dating abuse victimization (Welch's t = ?1.9, p < 0.058, d = 0.12) and sexting (Welch's t = 0.94, p < 0.410, d = 0.03).

Regarding the type of school (private and public), significant differences were only found in the risks of online grooming (t = ?3.37, p < 0.001, d = 0.13) and sexting (t = 3.8, p < 0.001, d = 0.15). The mean scores were higher in public schools than in private schools in both cases.

In terms of the educational stage (1st–2nd grade of CSE, 3rd–4th grade of CSE and Post-secondary Education), statistically significant differences were found for the risks of cyberbullying victimization (p < 0.002), online grooming (p < 0.001), sexting (p < 0.001) and problematic Internet use (p < 0.001). The scores were higher in 3rd–4th grades, except for online grooming victimization, where higher scores were found in Post-secondary Education (see Dining table 2 ).

Table 2

Variations due to the fact a purpose of instructional phase (1st–2nd, 3rd–fourth levels out-of CSE and you can Post-secondary Degree) in the threats (n = 3212, with the exception of the situation away from cyber dating discipline having n = 1061).

Note: Yards = arithmetic indicate; SD = fundamental deviation, F = Welch’s-F, p = significance; ? 2 = eta squared.

Desk step three shows brand new correlations amongst the various threats. All of them got confident and significant correlations together, into relationship ranging from cyberbullying victimization and you may cyber dating victimization condition out. Internet dangers that have a sexual role (on line brushing and you may sexting) have been very correlated. Overall, the new correlations was higher for people for the majority of one’s risks, with the exception of the brand new relationship ranging from cyber dating victimization and you can grooming and you will between problematic Sites use and cyberbullying victimization, on line brushing and you may sexting.

Desk step 3

Note: The correlations for boys are shown below the diagonal and for girls above it. All correlations are significant at p < 0.001. M = arithmetic mean; SD = standard deviation.

Table 4 merchandise the fresh new comorbidities one of many individuals Websites dangers related so you’re able to individual communication (cyberbullying victimization, cyber relationship abuse victimization, sexting an internet-based brushing). Just the users whom done all the items regarding dangers associated so you’re able to victimization (n = 1109) was in fact felt (i.e., eliminating on studies individuals who didn’t come with spouse). Of your own kept participants, 60.7% demonstrated a minumum of one of your own analysed threats (letter = 674). The risk on large personal incidence try cyberbullying victimization (%), followed by on the web grooming. The most widespread a few-risk combinations have been cyberbullying victimization-on the web grooming and you will cyberbullying-sexting. We emphasize the 3-exposure mixture of cyberbullying-sexting-brushing victimization. In the end, 5.49% of the victimized teens demonstrated all of the dangers conjointly.